Free Consultations Available

Free Consultations Available

Can I Sue the Owner of a Dog that Bites Me?

Can I Sue the Owner of a Dog that Bites Me?

Often, lawyers are asked about whether a lawsuit may be brought for harm caused by a dog bite. Montana does permit recovery for injuries due to dog bites, provided they are filed within three years. However, the standard to prove a dog bite case depends on the circumstances, and there are at least two defenses to dog bite claims.

The Montana Legislature has passed what is known as a “strict liability” law that governs dog bites that occur in incorporated cities or towns. This means that unless a defense applies, dog owners are liable to the person bitten, contingent upon a few factors:

  • The injury occurred in an incorporated city or town;
  • The dog had not been provoked; and
  • The victim was either in a public place or was lawfully on private property.

What’s more, when these circumstances apply, Montana applies a “one-bite” rule, which means that the dog need not have been known as vicious or to have bitten anyone before for the owner to be held liable.

Montana’s law specifically includes postal workers as “lawfully” on private property, as well as those invited to the property.

The owner of a dog who violates Montana’s one-bite rule in cities and towns may assert two defenses to the claim: provocation and trespassing. To prove the provocation defense, the dog’s owner would need to demonstrate that the dog was provoked, resulting in the bite. The second defense would require the owner to show that the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property.

The strict liability statute does not apply in rural areas. In such a case, the victim would need to show that the bite resulted from the owner’s negligence in controlling the dog. Recovery might also require the victim to show that the owner knew or should have known of the dog’s violent tendencies.

If you have suffered an injury at the hands of another, you may have a right to recover under Montana law. Tipp & Buley has a long history representing victims of personal injury in Western Montana. Please call today to discuss the facts of your case: 406-812-7634.

Contact Us

Get a Free Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
How Would You Like To Be Contacted?

Practice Areas

More Posts

two workers walking near parked semi-truck trailer at rural gravel lot

What Is the MCS-90 Endorsement and How Does It Help Missoula Truck Victims?

Federal Insurance Protection Behind Big Rigs on Montana Highways Key Takeaways: The MCS-90 endorsement is a federally mandated attachment to interstate motor carrier liability policies that requires insurers to pay judgments to injured parties, even when policy exclusions might bar coverage. It functions like a suretyship, the insurer pays first,

Read More »
Missoula Police officer conducting roadside flashlight sobriety test on civilian

How Accurate Is the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test in a Missoula DUI Case?

What Missoula Drivers Should Know About Eye-Tracking Roadside Tests Key Takeaways: The horizontal gaze nystagmus test measures an officer’s visual impression of involuntary eye jerking, not alcohol concentration. Each of the three standard clues is a subjective judgment made without instruments, and body camera footage often cannot verify what the

Read More »
two people seated at office table with document, car keys, and law books

What Are Ridley Advance Medical Payments in a Missoula Car Accident Claim?

Getting Your Medical Bills Paid Before Your Montana Crash Case Settles Key Takeaways: Ridley advance medical payments require an at-fault driver’s liability insurer to pay a Missoula crash victim’s medical expenses as incurred, rather than withholding payment until settlement. The rule comes from Ridley v. Guaranty National Insurance Co. (1997)

Read More »