Free Consultations Available

Free Consultations Available

Is My Employer Allowed to Take Money From My Check for Uniforms?

Is My Employer Allowed to Take Money From My Check for Uniforms?

Many employers require their employees to wear uniforms. Are employers or employees responsible for the cost? The short answer is, it depends. The federal Fair Labor Standards Act and subsequent regulations govern the payment of wages, the most notable aspect of which is the minimum wage. The question of whether or not an employer can require employees to pay for uniforms, either directly or by payroll deduction, depends on whether the practice would interfere with the payment of the minimum wage. The FLSA considers the cost of uniforms as a business expense, not a part of the employee’s wages.

The first inquiry into whether or not an employer has correctly or incorrectly withheld wages in payment for a uniform is whether or not the clothing involved is in fact a uniform. Under the FLSA, the three main categories of uniform clothing are as follows:

  • clothing that displays the employer’s logo;
  • clothing that might be considered a costume; and
  • clothing that is distinctive in terms of style or color.

Generally, the less specific the clothing, even though required, the less likely it would be considered a uniform. A good test is to consider whether the clothing might be worn by the employee for occasions other than work. Khaki pants, button down shirts, polo shirts, blue jeans, or other types of common casual clothing would not be considered a uniform.

For employers, the withholding of wages for the cost of uniforms can be a problem when employees are earning the federal minimum wage or only slightly above. In such cases, the deduction of uniform costs from wages could result in the wage of the employee falling below the required minimum. For employees earning enough to offset the cost, there would be no prohibition from making such a deduction. Included in the cost of uniforms is any specialized upkeep such as dry cleaning. If an employee must incur cleaning costs, he or she would be entitled to reimbursement to the extent the minimum wage for the workweek was not met.

At Tipp & Buley, we have over 55 years of collective experience in employment-related legal matters. If you believe you’ve been paid less than the minimum wage by your employer, please call us. We’ll put our experience to work for you. Call 406-812-7634 or visit us online to set up a one-on-one consultation.

Contact Us

Get a Free Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
How Would You Like To Be Contacted?

Practice Areas

More Posts

sedan with Montana license plate showing rear bumper damage and fallen debris on driveway

What Is Uninsured Motorist Stacking in a Missoula Car Accident Claim?

Understanding How Multiple Insurance Policies Can Expand Your Recovery After a Missoula Crash Key Takeaways: Uninsured motorist stacking means combining UM coverage limits from multiple vehicles or policies so an injured person may access a larger pool of benefits after a crash. In a Missoula car accident claim, stacking may

Read More »
rear undercarriage of parked semi-truck trailer with dual tires and wheel chocks

What Is a Semi-Truck Underride Guard Defect Under Missoula Injury Law?

When a Truck’s Rear Guard Fails: Understanding Underride Crashes in Missoula Key Takeaways: A semi-truck underride guard defect occurs when the rear impact guard beneath a trailer fails to stop a passenger vehicle from sliding underneath during a collision, turning a survivable crash into a catastrophic one. Failures can stem

Read More »
ankle monitor and Court-based Program Enrollment document on wooden table

Who Qualifies for 24/7 Sobriety Monitoring After a Missoula DUI Arrest?

Understanding Court-Ordered Alcohol Testing After a Montana DUI Key Takeaways: Whether you face 24/7 sobriety monitoring after a Missoula DUI arrest depends on your offense history and the judge’s order. Under Mont. Code Ann. §§ 44-4-1201 through 44-4-1205 and Mont. Admin. R. 23.18.302, courts may impose monitoring at bond, sentencing,

Read More »